backtracking the message log the same error happened during the creation of the volume before rebooting. Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote on 2011-11-27: #28 [Expired for linux (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] Changed in linux (Ubuntu): status: Incomplete → Expired Ilya A. pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xd4820000 irq 47' Mixer name : 'Analog Devices AD1984A' Components : 'HDA:11d4194a,103c30e1,00100400 HDA:11c11040,103c1378,00100200' Controls : Lustre-2.4.1 RHEL-6.4 Nov 18 07:03:31 st61 modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting crc32c_intel (/lib/modules/2.6.32-358.18.1.el6_lustre.x86_64/kernel/arch/x86/crypto/crc32c-intel.ko): No such device Nov 18 07:03:31 st61 kernel: alg: No test for crc32 (crc32-table) Nov 18 07:03:31 st61 kernel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519456
Reply With Quote « Previous Thread | Next Thread » Bookmarks Bookmarks Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google Facebook Twitter Posting Permissions You may not post new threads You may not post replies Jun 12 23:20:31 pc kernel: [ 198.670027] eth0: no IPv6 routers present Jun 12 23:20:32 pc ntpdate: adjust time server 126.96.36.199 offset -0.406334 sec Jun 12 23:25:30 pc kernel: [ 497.243444] Nov 18 07:03:35 st61 modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/2.6.32-358.18.1.el6_lustre.x86_64/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device Nov 18 07:03:39 st61 kernel: Lustre: Lustre: Build Version: 2.4.1-RC2--PRISTINE-2.6.32-358.18.1.el6_lustre.x86_64 This happens when we are loading Lustre on
I see modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/2.6.38-11-generic/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device during boot up. As a result we are closing this bug. > > If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of > Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug Projecting raster z-values from foot to meters? My encrypted partitions (luks, ext4) still open and are accessible.
May 9 21:01:31 schambrin-laptop kernel: [ 16.584529] padlock_sha: VIA PadLock Hash Engine not detected. thanks, bepaald __________________ Running F20 x86_64 with KDE Intel Core i7-4771 @ 3.5GHz 8G RAM bepaald View Public Profile Find all posts by bepaald #8 24th July 2009, 08:01 lvmdump seems to indicate that the volume is, in fact, encrypted. check here Fedora 11 is > no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further > security or bug fix updates.
When I look at the logs to see why, I see this: Jul 4 13:31:50 localhost kernel: LNet: HW CPU cores: 2, npartitions: 1 Jul 4 13:31:50 localhost kernel: alg: No Respectfully, Jose A. How do I catch a Ditto? Mark as duplicate Convert to a question Link a related branch Link to CVE You are not directly subscribed to this bug's notifications.
Kernel tries to autoload drivers for crypt accelerators (here VIA Padlock) but such device is not avalible on that system. type: PLAIN cipher: aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 keysize: 256 bits device: /dev/sda3 offset: 0 sectors size: 6297480 sectors mode: read/write # free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 2004 1886 117 0 If I configured encrypted file system via anaconda and there is no such error message so I believe there is something I missed or did not do right. have a peek here FYI,Ibelievethesemessageshavebeenaroundsince9.000.
Show Alexander Boyko added a comment - 06/Jul/12 2:24 AM - edited >>there is about a 10 second pause before the load completes because libcfs run performance test for supported crypto However I added an encrypted swap partition (cipher: aes-cbc-essiv:sha256) afterwards. Fedora 11 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates.
padlock-sha.ko was not loaded cause you have no VIA PadLock Hash Engine hardware. It's not really the fault of the tools, but instead that the module doesn't initialize because the hardware is not present. We'd love to hear about it! What shall we do.
I'm closing this. If this fatal message confuse, you can blacklist padlock-sha module. Topics: Active | Unanswered Index ┬╗Kernel & Hardware ┬╗padlock-sha Pages: 1 #1 2010-05-08 16:28:41 ith Member Registered: 2010-05-08 Posts: 3 padlock-sha Hello I am tryiing to connect to my vpn, via http://theresab.com/fatal-error/fatal-error-fet.html Bug519456 - FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (.../padlock-sha.ko): No such device Summary: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (.../padlock-sha.ko): No such device Status: CLOSED NOTABUG Aliases: None Product: Fedora Classification: Fedora Component: kernel (Show
Comment 16 Bug Zapper 2010-06-28 10:18:54 EDT Fedora 11 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-06-25. Subscribing... kernel-PAE-188.8.131.52-102.fc11.i686 cryptsetup-luks-1.0.6-7.fc11.i586 Comment 13 Jon Masters 2010-02-25 16:25:45 EST Let's keep an eye on this one. is klogged cryptsetup is obviously very security sensitive, and it is important that users get a feeling that it is secure.
AplayDevices: **** List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices **** card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: AD198x Analog [AD198x Analog] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: **** List of modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/184.108.40.206-191.fc11.i586/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device See similar errors reported on ubuntu forums... Join Us! I thought it was just my own newbie tweaking of crypttab that generated the error but google finds the same problem for other people with recent kernels.
Thanks _felix_ (fnoz) wrote on 2011-06-12: #5 Same message here, system doesn't boot anymore. I have one assumption: when performance test starts for sha algo, kernel crypto hash api try to load all *sha.ko, including padlock-sha.ko but this is wrong if you get VIA PadLock From a terminal window please run: apport-collect 779912 and then change the status of the bug back to 'New'. Sorry for the bad wording.
Could the solid boosters of SLS be replaced by reusable Falcon 9 first stages? I was trying to connect to a microsoft pptp vpn through the KNetworkManager. Not the answer you're looking for? So apparently it is loaded for people who have that chip so they can take advantage of their cool hardware, and for us it simply fails and nothing bad really happens.
Because on my system without one the non-hardware accelerated module sha256_generic gets loaded for my LUKS partition.